About Me

My photo
I have a health ministry for friends, family, and health lovers world-wide. I'm totally into all-natural and avoid chemicals, food additives, etc. even in my cosmetics. I am working toward eating Vegan, Organic, and raw as much as possible (my family too). I'm married, and have two teen daughters that I homeschooled up until high School and two grown step kids. Optimal Health - God's Way ".....and the fruit thereof shall be for meat (FOOD), and the leaf for MEDICINE." Ezekiel 47:12 KJV

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Stop Using Canola Oil Immediately!

IN NUTRITIONTOXICITY |  
It’s my hope that you’ll never use Canola Oilagain! Why? Because of GMO’s (more on this below) and the harmful side effects from the processing of this oil. You know that Olive Oil comes from olives, and that Sesame Seed Oil comes from sesame seeds. It would make sense that Canola Oil comes from Canola Seeds, right? Well, there’s actually no such thing.
Canola is a made-up word which stands for “Canadian oil low acid”, and is a genetically modified product. It is a Canadian invention that is backed by the government. It’s a cheap product to manufacture, and almost all processed or packaged foods contain canola oil.
Facts You Should Know About Canola Oil
Canola Oil is produced from the rapeseed plant, which is a part of the mustard family. It’s an industrial oil, not a food, and has been used in candles, soaps, lipsticks, lubricants, inks and biofuels. Rapeseed oil is what is used to make mustard gas. In its natural state, it causes respiratory distress, constipation, emphysema, anemia, irritability and blindness.
Now that we have figured out how to genetically modify rapeseed oil, we sell it as an edible product. It has been brought to market with the claim that it is a wonder oil, that is low insaturated fats, and has omega-3 fatty acids. The problem is that it is still just rapeseed that has been genetically modified.
Studies have shown that rapeseed has a cumulative effect, and can take close to ten years to manifest symptoms. One claim of long term use is the destruction of the protective coating around the nerves called the myelin sheath. This is how Multiple Sclerosis begins. Some of the symptoms presented have been:
  • Shaking & Tremors
  • Breathing Problems
  • Difficulty Walking Or Writing
  • Slurred Speech
  • Heart Problems
  • Thought Process Degrades
  • Memory Problems
  • Low Audio Levels
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Nervous Breakdown
  • Numbness Of Extremities
What else can it do to you? Canola oil will deplete Vitamin E, and will interfere with normal metabolism and enzyme function. It also suppresses the immune system. Rapeseed Oil is a monounsaturated oil, and has high levels of erucic acid. Erucic Acid is a fatty acid that is associated with heart damage, specifically Heshan’s Disease, a disease that manifests itself with fibrotic lesions of the heart.
In the 1970′s, food manufacturers came up with a method to genetically modify the rapeseed plant by seed splitting. This process produced a canola oil with less erucic acid, and higher amounts of oleic acid, which lead to additional concerns with canola oil, like:
  • Blood Platelet Abnormalities
  • Retards Normal Growth (Illegal in infant formulas)
  • Free Radical Damage
  • Higher Cancer Risks Due To The Hydrogenation Process
It’s also important to understand that this new processed oil goes through many steps, most of which harm the nutritional value, introduce toxins, and actually change the oil’s structure causing it to become hydrogenated oil.
Those are the types of oils you want to avoid like the plague: Hydrogenated and Partially Hydrogenated oils!
Trans fatty acids are the result of this hydrogenation process. These are hazardous by-products, and are health destroyers. You should stop cooking with these oils:
* Corn Oils * Safflower Oils * Soy Oils
Food manufacturers are not required by law to tell you if their products contain GMO’s. It’s up to us to be well informed, and read the labels. Monsanto has been incorporating genetically modified organisms in its canola oil seeds, and now we know that Monsanto has also been selling GMO seeds for the following plants:
  • Canola
  • Alfalfa
  • Corn
  • Cotton
  • Wheat
  • Sorghum
  • Soybeans
  • Sugarbeets

How to Choose A Good Oil

When you’re buying a cooking oil, consider these things:
1. Choose a “Cold Pressed” or “Extra Virgin” type.
2. Should be available in glass containers.
3. The bottle should be a dark color, and kept in a dark place once opened.
4. Make sure it is GMO-free.
5. Go with Organic.
What does Extra-Virgin Mean? It’s simply another way of referring to “cold pressed”, which means that the oil was made by using pressure to extract the oil from the seeds, grains, nuts, etc., and there was no heat utilized during the processing. Heat causes a degrading of the nutritional value of the oil. Extra Virgin also means that no chemical solvent was used, nor was it deodorized or altered in any way.
What Oil to Use Instead? I personally cook with coconut oil more than any other oil. It’s good for weight loss, cooking, moisturizing and tons of other great uses. I recommend the brand Garden of Life Coconut Oil, which you can get at my online store, HERE.

Now that you’re armed with the facts, use them to guard your health! Stay clear of Canola Oil, and all GMO foods.
Other resources: 
Look for foods with the Non-GMO label. More info here: nongmoproject.org
Check out the Non-GMO Shopping guide here: nongmoshoppingguide.com

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Frankenscientists announce mutant GMO cows to produce hormone-induced 'engineered' milk for human babies


Tuesday, October 02, 2012
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)


(NaturalNews) The world of genetic engineering has fallen even further into the surreal with the announcement that New Zealand "scientists" have unveiled a genetically modified mutant cloned cow which they say produces a reduced-allergen milk for consumption by human babies. This is being reported by the BBC and elsewhere.

Horrifyingly, these Frankenscientists cloned a cow and then altered the embryo using RNA interference. After gestation, the mutant GMO cow was born without a tail! But these scientists say that's no problem, and that the mutation of having no tail couldn't possibly be related to anything they did with the cow's DNA.

I'm not making this up. This is the insanity of the quack science world in which we now live.

Milk causes allergies primarily because of pasteurization

The entire project is a fool's errand to begin with since the reason most humans are allergic to cow's milk is because of pasteurization which destroys lactase enzymes. RAW MILK is far easier to digest, but of course raw milk has been all but criminalized in America, where the FDA along with Ventura County and LA County in California actually stage armed raids on raw milk distribution centers and throw people in jail. James Stewart, for example, remains in jail this very day for the "crime" of being involved in raw milk. Sign the petition HERE to demand freedom for James.

So while criminalizing fresh milk and pushing an inferior, dead, pasteurized milk that causes allergies in those who drink it, the corrupt food system in America is almost certain to embrace mutant genetically modified cloned cow's milk and call it "safe" for infants!

Never mind the fact that the genetically altered milk produced by this cow had "double the concentrations of caseins," as The Guardian is reporting.

Oh, and by the way, the milk being produced by this mutant, cloned, tail-less GMO cow is of course 100% driven by artificial hormones! As the BBC reports:

"It has not yet become pregnant and produced milk normally so the scientists used hormones to jump-start milk production."

How to make a mutant GM cow and tell your friends you're a mad scientist

This story gets even more disturbing. Take a look at how this cow was produced! According to The Guardian:

To make Daisy [the cow], scientists took a cow skin cell and genetically modified it to produce molecules that block the manufacture of BLG protein. The nucleus of this cell was then transferred into a cow egg that had its own nucleus removed.

The reconstituted egg was grown in the lab until it formed what is called a blastocyst, a ball of around 100 cells, and then transplanted into the womb of a foster cow.

The cloning technique is not efficient. Of around 100 blastocysts the scientists implanted into cows, more than half of the pregnancies failed early on, and only one live calf, Daisy, was born.


And even that calf was a mutant calf, born without a tail, rendering the whole thing a horrifying example of genetic mutilation.

STOP the genetic mutilation of animals and humans

These outrageous experiments on animals are rightly called "genetic mutilation." These animals are being mutilated. Ninety-nine percent of them DIE before they're even born, and the ones that somehow manage to be born are mutants.

This research is a dangerous journey into the horrors of "unanticipated consequences." And to think... these Frankenscientists want human babies to drink this milk! It must be great for babies!

So let me get this straight: It's illegal in America to milk a cow, sell that fresh milk to a neighbor and have their baby drink fresh milk with all the digestive enzymes intact. But it's perfectly acceptable in our world to engineer mutant cloned genetically modified cows to produce hormone-induced, artificially-engineered milk that will be fed en masse to human babies?

What's wrong with this picture?

Humanity is risking a genetic apocalypse

This has got to stop, friends. The mad GMO scientists are operating in gross violation of natural law. They are playing genetic roulette with Mother Nature. They're fumbling in the dark with dangerous tools, like children with suitcase nukes and a happy red button that seems inviting to just push and see what happens.

Our modern-day human civilization has neither the ethical foundation nor the wisdom to pursue such technologies. Altering the digital code for the expression of life is not something to be pursued under the crude selfishness of corporate greed, nor the wild fantasies of naive scientists who relish in playing "what if" experiments with all remaining life on our planet.

These experiments on animals -- and crops -- are worse than foolish. They are inherently evil... even demented. Just because we know how to alter DNA doesn't mean we have the wisdom to understand the consequences of doing so. Yet in the race for the next biological profit machine -- a cow, a crop, or even a pharmaceutical -- caution is thrown out the window and replaced by pure mindless greed.

With the GM crops, the GM wheat that alters human liver function, the GM corn that causes cancer tumors, the GM cows and the GM seeds being carelessly strewn about, we are risking a genetic apocalypse that could destroy humanity in a cosmic blink of an eye.

No one knows what happens when the genetic engineering of mutant chimera animals get unleashed across the land. Nobody really knows the long-term effects of genetic pollution. Nobody even knows the long-term effects of humans eating GM crops!

So it's all a grand, malicious, conceited genetic experiment being carried out on us all: our bodies, our children, our lands, our animals, our crops and our planet.

The GM "scientists" are risking EVERYTHING. And they do so blindly, while mutilating animals and calling it "progress."

It is disgusting. It is an abomination. I pray for the sake of humanity that all genetic engineering activity in our planet is halted by any means necessary.

We are floating through space, my friends, on a blue ball of water inhabited by fools who call themselves "scientists."

They risk everything. And there is no backup plan.

Spread the word. SHARE this story. STOP the genetic mutilation of animals. HALT GMO crops and save our planet from the risk of total disaster.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/037396_GM_cows_clones_milk_production.html#ixzz2AdfliF5t

BPA causes obesity in children, new study shows


Tuesday, September 25, 2012 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer



(NaturalNews) Are the chemicals commonly found in thermal receipt paper, aluminum cans, and plastic containers causing your children to become overweight or obese? New research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) seems to suggest this may be the case, having found that children with the highest levels of the plastics chemical bisphenol-A (BPA) in their blood are also the largest among their peers.

For their study, researchers from the New York University (NYU) School of Medicine evaluated data from a nationwide health and nutrition survey that included roughly 3,000 children ranging in age from six to 19. About 33 percent of the children were overweight, while 18 percent were considered obese based on current body mass index (BMI) guidelines.

On average, the children who participated in the survey had roughly three nanograms, or about three-billionths of a gram, of BPA in every milliliter of their urine. After adjusting for outside factors that may have affected the results, researchers found that only about 10 percent of the kids on the lowest end of the BPA spectrum were obese, while 22 percent of the children on the high end were obese.

"Overall, we observed a positive association between increasing levels of urinary BPA and both measures of obesity, independent of potential confounding factors including smoking, alcohol consumption, and serum cholesterol levels," wrote the authors of the original survey, which was published in the journal ISRN Endocrinology back in 2008.

"Elevated levels of urinary BPA are associated with measures of obesity independent of traditional risk factors, (and) this association is consistently present across gender and race-ethnic groups." (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22852093)

BPA, a hormone-disrupting, disease-causing poison

Since BPA has already been positively identified as an endocrine disruptor, it is widely believed that the chemical's hormone-altering properties may be responsible for such weight gain in many individuals. BPA has also been shown in hundreds of published studies over the last decade to cause other serious conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, reproductive problems, neurological damage, early puberty, and cancer. (http://www.naturalnews.com/BPA.html)

"BPA is commonplace -- found in copious brands of fruit, vegetables, soda, and other frequently eaten canned goods," write Brenda Watson and Leonard Smith in their book The Detox Strategy: Vibrant Health in 5 Easy Steps (http://www.naturalpedia.com/book_The_Detox_Strategy.html). "What's most troubling about the recent reports of BPA's prevalence ... is that it remains entirely without safety standards. It is allowed in unlimited amounts in consumer products, drinking water, and food, the top exposure source for most people."

Other prominent sources of BPA include thermal receipt paper, aluminum and steel can linings, plastic containers and packaging, composite dental fillings, pizza boxes, conventional napkins, paper towels, and toilet paper, wines fermented in plastic vats, and paper money.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.reuters.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/037307_BPA_obesity_children.html#ixzz2AddntDgU

Painkillers cause severe headaches


Tuesday, September 25, 2012 

by: J. D. Heyes




(NaturalNews) Taking a painkiller for that bad back or those bum knees? That could explain why you might be having so many headaches as well, according to new research from the United Kingdom.

According to doctors, up to one million people in the UK have "completely preventable" headaches that can be quite severe and are caused by taking too many painkillers.

Doctors have said some patients have become trapped in a "vicious cycle" of taking such medications, which in turn has led to even more headaches, the BBC reported.

The information and warning come as part of the first guidelines for treating headaches put out by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines also recommended using acupuncture to treat headaches in some circumstances.

'An easy thing to prevent'

What the organization has described as "medication overuse headaches" tend to feel the same as other types of common headaches and migraines. And while there is no definitive data in the UK regarding the incidence of the condition, studies in other countries suggest that between one and two percent of people are affected.

The World Health Organization, meanwhile, says figures are actually closer to five percent, according to some reports.

"Various forms of headache, properly called headache disorders, are among the most common disorders of the nervous system. They are pandemic and, in many cases, life-long conditions," says a WHO Media Center report. "The evident burden of headache disorders on individuals and on society is sufficient to justify a strategic change in the approach to headache management."

The natural response to such a condition would actually be to increase use of painkillers, but that is only worsening it, say UK researchers.

"This can end up getting into a vicious cycle where your headache gets worse, so you take more painkillers, so your headache gets worse and this just becomes worse and worse and worse," says Prof. Martin Underwood, of Warwick Medical School, who led the NICE panel, adding: "It is such an easy thing to prevent."

Researchers aren't exactly sure how painkillers cause headache disorders. But what is known is that most of those affected by the condition are believed to have started suffering either every day tension-type headaches or migraines which became worse as they tried to treat them at home.

Manjit Matharu, a consultant neurologist at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, told the BBC there appeared to be a point after 10 to 15 days' worth of using pain relief each month when the medications became an issue.

Over-medicating with painkillers is the problem so go natural

"This is a huge problem in the population," he said. "The figures in terms of the number of people who have medication overuse headache are one in 50, so that is approximately a million people who have headaches on a daily or near daily basis because they're using painkillers."

According to the panel, people who have a family history of tension headaches or migraines could be genetically more vulnerable to headaches caused by medication overuse. Such people could also be susceptible when taking pain relief for other reasons not related to headaches.

The new NICE guidelines for physicians in England and Wales recommend telling sufferers to stop taking all forms of pain relief immediately - though that is likely to lead to a few weeks of agony as patients will then have to deal with headaches sans pain relief, until their symptoms eventually improve.

That said, there are a number of natural remedies for headaches and migraines, many of which are extremely simple and effective, and which could alleviate the need for any medications at all. They include herbal remedies like feverfew, mineral supplementation with magnesium, B2 and CoEnzymeQ10, and various oils like fish oil and peppermint oil. Read about here at Natural News.

Sources:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-19622016

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22547100

http://www.naturalnews.com/migraines.html

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/037309_painkillers_headaches_medication.html#ixzz2AddSj1jg

Receivers of flu vaccine more likely to catch H1N1 virus, new study finds


Monday, September 24, 2012 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer



(NaturalNews) New information has emerged concerning the Great Swine Flu Hoax of 2009 and the mass vaccination hysteria that accompanied it. As it turns out, the seasonal influenza vaccine that was pushed on everyone as an added preventive measure against H1N1 appears to have been responsible for actually inducing more cases of H1N1 infection, this according to shocking new data procured by an influenza expert at Canada's B.C. Centre for Disease Control.

Dr. Danuta Skowronski from the Canadian equivalent of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently observed as part of a comprehensive analysis that individuals who received an annual flu shot during the 2008-09 winter season had a disproportionately higher risk of developing H1N1 infection than individuals who were not vaccinated. Confirming earlier suspicions, Dr. Skowronski and her colleagues observed after recreating the phenomenon in a group of ferrets that the annual flu shot from that year was definitively linked to higher rates of H1N1 infection.

Presented at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy in San Francisco, the study included evaluating 32 ferrets, half of who received the 2008-09 seasonal flu shot, and the other half of who received a placebo shot. The researchers did not know which ferrets received which vaccine until the end of the study.

Upon conclusion, all the ferrets ended up developing H1N1, but the ferrets from the vaccinated group were the first to get it. The vaccinated group also became much sicker than the unvaccinated group, and appears to have very likely infected the unvaccinated group. These findings match up with those of five other Canadian studies conducted in other provinces outside British Columbia where elevated rates of H1N1 infection were also observed among individuals who had received their annual flu shot.

"The findings are consistent with the increased risk that we saw in the human studies," said Dr. Skowronski to the Vancouver Sun.

What this all goes to show, of course, is that not only was the seasonal flu shot a failure at preventing H1N1, but it was also apparently a cause of H1N1 infection. If the seasonal flu shot had been properly tested, which it most definitely was not, it would have become apparent that the shot was not only ineffective at preventing H1N1, but also a definitive cause of H1N1 infection.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.prisonplanet.com

http://www.vancouversun.com

http://www.cidrap.umn.edu

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/037302_flu_vaccines_H1N1_infections.html#ixzz2Ada9u8Pz

Children born to parents who eat GM wheat may DIE before age five, warn scientists


Thursday, September 20, 2012 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer



(NaturalNews) Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) has developed a novel variety of genetically-modified (GM) wheat that contains an altered protein and enzyme-suppressing mechanism that some scientists are now saying could cause serious problems for the human liver. A recent report compiled by several acclaimed experts in the field of genetics says that children born to parents who consume this GM wheat variety could actually end up dying before they reach the age of five.

This shocking revelation comes at the same time as CSIRO has announced that Australia's Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) has granted the group approval for two field trials of both wheat and barley that have been modified in this untested way. Since the technology directly inhibits an enzyme in wheat that is very closely linked to glycogen, a polysaccharide produced in the liver, consuming wheat or barley that contains these genetic alterations will very likely lead to liver failure, and eventually death.

"If this (technology) silences the same sort of gene in us -- as it silences in the wheat -- then, well, children who are born with this enzyme not working tend to die by the age of about five," says Professor Judy Carman, a biochemist and director of the IHER, Flinders University, who helped compile the report. "And adults with this problem, just kind of get more and more sick, and more and more tired, until they get very, very ill indeed."

Australian regulatory authorities approved field trials of deadly GM wheat without any evidence of safety

Carman worked with both Michael Antoniou, a molecular genetics expert from Kings College in London, and Prof. Jack Heinemann, a Lecturer in Genetics at the University of Canterbury, to compile and present these very serious concerns about the safety of CSIRO's GM wheat for public and expert review. According to Heinemann, there is no evidence that CSIRO even considered the fact that its GM wheat could obstruct glycogen production, and OGTR was apparently unconcerned about this very serious possibility when it freely granted the group approval for field trials.

"What we found is that the molecules created in this wheat, intended to silence wheat genes, can match human genes," said Heinemann during a recent press conference hosted by the Safe Food Foundation. "And through ingestion, these molecules can enter human beings and potentially silence our genes."

You can watch that press conference here:
http://youtu.be/FI7n_caiTvE

Currently, CSIRO's GM wheat has not been approved for commercial use, which means it is not being used in the food supply at this time. But since Australian authorities so easily approved field trials for the "Frankenwheat" without demanding so much as a shred of evidence that it is safe for human consumption illustrates just how easily this genetic poison will also likely be foisted on the public without such evidence in the very near future.

"If CSIRO cannot provide immediate and adequate responses to these issues, we call on them to cease all field trials currently underway, stop all plans for human feeding trials, and agree to undertake the recommended safety testing," says Scott Kinnear, Director of the Safe Food Foundation.

Sources for this article include:

http://au.news.yahoo.com

http://gmwatch.org

http://www.naturalnews.com/037170_GM_wheat_liver_failure_GMO.html

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/037261_GM_wheat_liver_failure_fatalities.html#ixzz2AdFLZEAq

The top 10 breakfast cereals most likely to contain Monsanto's GMO corn


Tuesday, September 25, 2012
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)

(NaturalNews) By now, nearly everyone interested in healthy living is aware of the recent research linking Monsanto's GMO corn to cancer tumors and an increase risk of premature death in both men and women. News of the research is spreading like wildfire across the 'net, and support for Proposition 37 -- which seeks to label GMOs in foods -- is growing by the day.


But the media has not yet reported on the everyday foods being sold in grocery stores right now and made with Monsanto's genetically modified corn (GM corn). Which foods are most likely to contain Monsanto GM corn? To answer this question, I visited a local grocery store in Austin, Texas and purchased 10 breakfast cereals made with high levels of non-organic corn.

According to the Center for Food Safety, up to 85% of the corn grown in the United States is genetically modified. This means corn-based cereals that use non-organic corn have a very high likelihood of containing GM corn.

The following list presents the top 10 popular breakfast cereals most likely to contain Monsanto's genetically modified corn. For the record, none of these cereals claim to be GMO-free, nor made with organic corn. The exact GMO content of these cereals remains a mystery precisely because manufacturers of these cereals refuse to label them with their GMO content. This lack of full disclosure by the food industry underscores the urgent need for a labeling law so that consumers can make an informed decision.

Legal note: In no way are we claiming these cereals will cause cancer tumors to grow in your body or that they pose an immediate risk to your health. Those studies have not yet been done on humans. GM corn is an experimental crop with unknown long-term effects of humans. Breakfast cereals made with GM corn may turn out to pose a significant long-term risk to human health, but that has not yet been determined. This article is presented in the public interest, reflecting reasonable caution over a common food ingredient which French scientists have now convincingly linked to cancer and premature death in studies conducted on rats.

The top 10 popular breakfast cereals most likely to contain Monsanto's GM corn

Cocoa Puffs and Corn Chex
 

Frosted Flakes and Honey Graham Oh's
 

Honey Nut Chex and Kashi Heart to Heart
 

Kellogg's Corn Flakes and Kellogg's Corn Pops
 

Kix and Barbara's Bakery Puffins Peanut Butter
 

Which cereals contain no GMOs? Nature's Path

There is only one brand of breakfast cereal I know of that's 100% non-GMO and 100% organic across their entire product line. That company is Nature's Path:

If you buy breakfast cereal, and you don't want to eat Monsanto's GM corn, always choose cereals from Nature's Path. This is my No. 1 most highly trusted cereal company.

Many "natural" brands that appear to be healthful and natural are actually not organic or GMO-free. For example, "Barbara's Bakery" cereals are not organic. Although they are positioned in store shelves alongside other organic cereals, they are actually made with conventional crops grown with pesticides which may include Monsanto's Roundup.

You may also notice that most of the cereals most likely to contain GM corn are children's cereals. It is the children in America who are being fed the most GMOs. This represents a highly unethical food experiment being conducted on an entire generation, and the long-term effects of human consumption of GMOs are simply not known.

What we do know is that rats fed this very same Monsanto GM corn developed shockingly large cancer tumors.

The photo released by the French research team, showing large cancer tumors growing at a strongly heightened risk in rats fed a "lifetime" of Monsanto's GM corn, is shown below. According to that study, 70% of females died premature and showed significant damage to their liver, kidneys and other organs.



Pretty crazy, huh?


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/037315_Monsanto_GM_corn_breakfast_cereals.html#ixzz2AdDPL9hN

Gary Null releases 'GMO Ticking Time Bomb' mini-documentary: Watch it here before it gets censored


Friday, October 05, 2012
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)

(NaturalNews) There is a conspiracy of oppression taking place right now against free speech about GMOs. Just this week, YouTube censored a whistleblower video that exposed Whole Foods employees lying about the fact that Whole Foods sells masses of genetically modified foods and is therefore a significant financial supporter of Monsanto.

It is now perfectly clear that this video was censored because of its truthful message, not because it actually violated any real terms of service with YouTube.

That's the reality in which we now live: Telling the truth about GMOs is practically a crime. The mainstream media, meanwhile, refuses to cover the truth about GMO dangers. And the U.S. government itself is, of course, completely sold out to corporate interests and thus won't warn the American people about GMOs, either.

We quite literally live in an age so bizarre and irrational that the simple act of warning fellow citizens about poison in the food is now systematically suppressed. The status quo wants you to eat your poison, shut up, stop asking questions and check yourself in at the nearest for-profit cancer center once those tumors start to show up.

That's the new system of oppression and slavery in America: It's medical slavery, economic slavery and even thought slavery.

The new video by Gary Null

Fighting back against that system are the courageous individuals who dare to tell the truth. And one of those individuals is Dr. Gary Null, Ph.D.

Gary Null has just released a stunning new video called "GMO Ticking Time Bomb."

It's a teaser, actually, for a much longer documentary to be released in the near future. Watch "GMO Ticking Time Bomb" at:

TV.NaturalNews.com

YouTube.com

Or watch the video embedded, below.

GMO Ticking Time Bomb is a must-see video offering an information-rich overview of the situation with GMOs. It features interviews with people like Jeffrey Smith, Ronnie Cummins, David Murphy and more.

In the film, Rima Laibow also explains how Monsanto and DuPont formed a joint venture to create the "Epicyte gene" that causes permanent, irreversible infertility in both men and women.

Watch it here, if you dare:




Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/037438_GMO_time_bomb_Gary_Null.html#ixzz2Ad9JTsQH

Majority of 'gluten-free' foods found to contain GMOs


Majority of 'gluten-free' foods found to contain GMOs


Wednesday, October 10, 2012
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)


(NaturalNews) In the wake of all the recent revelations about the dangers of GMOs, a special warning needs to go out to all those health-conscious consumers buying "gluten-free" foods. As it turns out, most "gluten-free" foods sold in the USA contain genetically modified organisms.

Why is this so? Because the primary ingredient in most gluten-free foods is corn. And most corn-based foods are made with genetically modified corn. Around 85% of the conventional corn grown in the USA is genetically modified corn, and that corn is engineered to produce its own deadly insecticide right inside every grain.

When GM corn is harvested and made into gluten-free foods, the insecticide stays with it and resides in the gluten-free food. As a result, people who are buying gluten-free are often exposing themselves to the risk of toxicity from GM corn.

What are those risks, exactly? No one knows for sure, as GMOs are still a radical agricultural experiment being conducted on the population at large. But French researchers recently found that feeding a lifetime of GM corn to rats caused a huge increase in the risk of developing horrifying, massive tumors and premature death. The rats who were fed GM corn also suffered widespread organ damage.

How to avoid GM corn in gluten-free foods

The only gluten-free foods that don't contain GM corn are those foods that either don't use corn as an ingredient or ones that use certified organic corn. GMOs are not allowed under an organic label.

Sadly, there are very few gluten-free foods that are also USDA organic. So gluten-free shoppers have very few choices if they wish to avoid both gluten as well as GMOs.

Even worse, the fact that GMOs are still not labeled on foods turns the act of gluten-free shopping into a mystery minefield of dangerous guesswork. The upcoming ballot measure Proposition 37 would, of course, mandate the labeling of genetically engineered ingredients in all foods sold in California, and that is expected to cause sweeping changes across the entire food industry if it passes.

In the mean time, my advice is to avoid all gluten-free foods unless they are USDA organic. If you don't, you may be avoiding gluten but ingesting GMO instead, effectively trading one toxin for another. And that's not what you bargained for, is it?

Check the labels of all gluten-free foods

Do the ingredients include corn? Corn syrup? Maltodextrin? These are all corn derivatives, and if they're not USDA organic, they're likely to be genetically modified.

Of course, this is NOT true outside the USA. GMOs are already banned in many countries, and GMO labeling laws exist in prominent nations around the world. This article is written solely for American consumers who remain inundated with genetically modified corn grown from the evil seed of Monsanto and other biotech seed suppliers.

Beware of gluten-free. Do your homework before taking another bite. While avoiding gluten is a wonderful strategy for many people, you don't want to trade one possible toxin for another possible toxin.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/037494_gluten-free_GMOs_GM_corn.html#ixzz2Ad7Qei6R

Leukemia after DPT vaccine?

A few weeks ago my friend's 13 yr-old son was diagnosed with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia after getting the DPT vaccine. He was perfectly healthy until he left home for the summer to visit his dad, without his nutritional supplements or mom watching over his diet. Then he got the shot one week before coming home to get ready for 7th grade (due to a new vaccine regulation), and out of nowhere he got really sick with aggressive Leukemia right after he got back! Please pray for him! He is home continuing oral chemo but improving so fast that the docs already eliminated one of his meds! Since the day his mom called me he has been on an organic raw food diet with powerful nutritional supplements from eXfuze and no sugar! We started all this at the hospital with NO support from his doc who admits he knows nothing about nutrition or the nurse who thinks that sugar feeding cancer is a myth. Go figure.

Sound hard to believe that he may have gotten Leukemia f

rom the DPT vaccine? Check this out:

Read this thread from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society blog site from a woman whose daughter got Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) right after getting the DPT vaccine. Now her son is showing the same CML symptoms after getting the same vaccine. So sad!
http://community.lls.org/thread/6801?tstart=309

Here is what DPT is for:
diphtheria - tetanus - pertussis

What it contains:
Chemicals and heavy metals -
formaldehyde, aluminum phosphate, ammonium sulfate, and thimerosal
Animal by-products -
washed sheep RBCs

General guidelines on vaccination risks:
Some things to keep in mind before getting a vaccination:

1. Known and suspected effects of many vaccines include -
asthma
eczema
increased allergies
encephalitis
cancer
leukemia
cot death
meningitis
lower motor neuron disease
juvenile diabetes
violent behavior

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Lemon Roasted Cauliflower recipe



www.DrAxe.com


Ingredients
  • 2 Tbsp grapeseed oil
    1 large head cauliflower, broken into bite sized pieces
    1 clove garlic, minced
    juice of 1/2 lemon
    1/2 tsp sea salt
    parsley as garnish (optional)
Directions
  1. Grease Baking sheet with oil
  2. In a mixing bowl, combine cauliflower, garlic & sea salt
  3. Spread on baking sheet
  4. Bake for 20-30 minutes at 425F
  5. Sprinkle lemon juice over top and garnish